A war imposed on Iran will not end in the United States.
A war imposed on Iran will not end in the United States.
A war imposed on Iran will not remain limited to the borders of this country; it will also reach U.S. territory. Although Trump initiated this confrontation, its outcome is no longer in his hands, because Washington has neither been able to force Iran to surrender nor conceal this failure through media propaganda. Political will alone is not enough to resolve this crisis, and Washington effectively has no leverage to control the final outcome of the war; because the key to the matter lies not in military details, but in the gap between “real power” and “perceived power.”
Trump now faces a challenge beyond his calculations: if Iran does not accept Washington’s terms—which is almost certain—the United States has no more than two options: either retreat or continue an attritional war. Choosing either path would mean formally accepting U.S. defeat. Therefore, the issue is not how much Trump is interested in or opposed to war; the central question is whether he has lost control of the battle he himself ignited. This situation does not mark the end of military actions; rather, it is the beginning of the clear emergence of signs of the decline of U.S. hegemony.
The more important transformation is taking shape on the domestic front in the United States. Voices of opposition are no longer limited to political rivals or traditional critics of the White House; rather, this opposition has penetrated the political system and reached ordinary citizens.
This phenomenon is a serious warning for Washington. The state can isolate political opponents, marginalize mainstream media, and keep rival parties occupied with exhausting political games; but when the costs of war become part of people’s daily lives, the matter goes beyond a political debate. As economic pressures are felt, fears about the future increase, and public distrust deepens, Americans will no longer be merely television spectators of the war; because the war has entered their lives.
In such an environment, Trump’s next speech is irrelevant; the real question is how long American society is willing to pay the price for decisions with unpredictable consequences. The war with Iran is no longer a distant military exercise; it has become a deep crisis in Washington’s domestic politics.
Trump may continue to speak of America’s absolute power, but the real power of a state is not measured by the number of fighter jets, missiles, or military bases it possesses; rather, it depends on its ability to maintain a balance between political decisions, economic costs, and public acceptance. Once this balance collapses, insisting on continuing the war is not a sign of strength, but evidence of desperation. The greatest transformation that has taken place is visible not in the rhetoric of the White House, but in the deep rupture between Washington and American society.
Author: Gouya Roshan
All rights reserved.

Comments
Post a Comment